The Black race, which lies in its history, the beauty of the people and their hospitality to the world, is without a doubt the most diverse race in the world. They also have proved to be very risky in their hospitality, but they have never stopped being the most hospitable, culturally diverse group in the world.
But I found that a quick look at the most fascinating historic accounts would bring it straight to what it was and still is like as a Blacks to many people who did not know about the uniqueness of this race and those who are sometimes labelled or called “Blacks.”
One should be proud of being black or coming from a black country because black history seems almost related to the world’s history. No story can be found in any part of the world or historical record that does not refer explicitly to a black people or black people, both in the Old and Modern World, that holds power.
One of these documents is the Bible, a book that I find especially relaxed and convincing.
Perhaps you can look at the Bible to find the best historical portrayal of black nations. Their web pages show that blacks have always been active in the fight for world domination and were revered and loved by nations all over the world at some point.
The Bible and The Black Nations.
“The princes will come forth from Egypt; soon will Ethiopia extend her hands to God” (Psalm 68:31).
Since the Bible is a multicultural book series, it may sound a little controversial for some people to say or believe that blacks were specifically listed and celebrated individually.
The multicultural history of the Bible demonstrates, however, that this concept should not be considered incorrect or unacceptable easily. There are many archaeological and historical proofs that this is really true.
The race has always been a sensitive topic when it comes to the Bible when people say that Jesus was white, they get just as upset with a black actor playing the part of a biblical person. I remember a time when people were upset that Samson’s part in “The Bible Miniseries” was played by a black man in 2013.
It was not long after that, they were furious that Jesus was white, said a Fox News broadcaster. But people, including Saint Nicknig, also find pictures of a dark brown person while researching biblical characters.
This is evidence that our religion has been strongly influenced by our race ideas. Something that in biblical times was not at all a concern.
Some people seem to want the apparent black presence in the Bible to be ignored, whether for one purpose or another they believe the Bible’s characters to be white actors or white. Sometimes called “whitewashing of history.” This is called Put intentionally the influence of the white societies over that of the blacks in biblical times. This inevitably leads in the way that biblical characters are represented to supremacy.
Evidence of the early Christian presence of blacks:
The paintings of the Roman Catacombs, painted by Christians of the early first/second century, are great proof. These paintings clearly depict coloured people and the question arises, what early Roman Christians will benefit by painting these black characteristics? And what did the races that seem to be absent today recognize and accept?
These questions can only be answered by looking at the effect of colourful people in the Bible on early Christian beliefs. Some people should question why it is a priority to research or search for such answers as the colour does not matter.
Why does Jesus always appear as a white man with blonde hair? The answer to this is clear. And why should it not be played by the people of colour in the role of biblical characters?
Blacks have been alluded to in the Bible in other important terms:
I should also mention that, as it was called “Egyptians, Ethiopians, cohorts,” the black people in the Bible or Africans in its pages were very difficult to see. Interestingly, 45 times in the Bible is the word “Ethiopian,” now add to the number of times Egypt has been listed, and you can see it would appear that more Africa is listed than any other landmass in the Bible.
One thing you should also note is that, until 1859 when the Suez Canal was done, the Middle East, including part of Jerusalem, linked with Africa.
There is much evidence from Genesis to Revelation that blacks are present in the entire bible, not only here, but also very important:
Adam is described as swarthy, dark-brown, reddish-brown, and dark as a shadow in Hebrew, pronounced as Adam. This is so correctly identified because of the colour of the soil that was supposed to have produced Adam, “Aphra.” After often has a vivid soil that is very black or very dark brown.
Do you remember that I listed Cushites, the words in the Bible used to refer to black nations? Well, the Bible says the Garden of Eden is near the four rivers in Cush, Havilah and Ashur, which means that the Garden of Eden is near the boundaries of Eastern Sudan, Ethiopia and Eritrea in contemporary times. It is the Garden of Eden.
Technically, this means that humanity’s birthplace is associated with Africa. This includes no other evidence except that in Ethiopia, 1974, the oldest human remains were identified. The Bible And science may not look at many things, but the two agree that humanity is founded in East Africa.
Defined marriage connection:
The association most biblical patriarchs had with Africa or Africans is another important aspect. Most Biblical patriarchs married women or had children from African tribes, according to the Bible. For example, Abraham had a baby from African (hematite) tribes with Hagar and Keturah. Zippora, who was Ethiopian, was married to Moses.
Two of Jacob’s son were two servants of African tribes who were patriarchs of two tribes in Israel.
The details above show, as many would like to say, that the Bible is not at all the “Wheat Mann Buch.” This is a multicultural book with a whitewashed past.
The problem is that we discourage the diversity of the Bible by whitewashing the Bible from being used by certain believers and the coming generation.
The lesson is easy, don’t always assume every biblical figure is white! That is completely mistaken and inutile. The multicultural origins of the Bible are compromised.
Article Credit: Thegrapher